Alabaster vs Khaki Shade
Both are Sherwin-Williams colors. Both sit in the beige-greige family, which is useful context if you're narrowing within a single hue direction. At LRV 82 vs 44, Alabaster will read as the brighter of the two — a 38-point gap that matters most in north-facing or low-light rooms. They share a warm quality — useful to know if you're layering them in the same space. At ΔE 22.6, these are genuinely distinct colors — a strong contrast if used together, or a meaningful choice between two different directions. Below you'll find 2 real-room photo comparisons where both colors appear side by side, plus 5 simulated room previews.
Alabaster vs Khaki Shade in Real Spaces
2 real rooms side by side. Seeing Alabaster and Khaki Shade in actual rooms makes the difference concrete; browse the spaces below to get a feel for how each color lives on a wall.
Living Room
Living rooms test a color across a full range of conditions — morning sun, afternoon shade, and evening lamp light all shift how both of these read. Alabaster returns significantly more light to the room — in a smaller or darker space, that difference in perceived brightness is hard to miss.
Home Office
In a home office, wall color sits in your peripheral vision for hours at a time, so temperature and undertone matter more than you might expect. The LRV gap is large enough that Alabaster will make the room feel meaningfully brighter than Khaki Shade would.
Color Details
Alabaster vs Khaki Shade Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see Alabaster on one side and Khaki Shade on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More Alabaster comparisons
See how Alabaster stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
With LRVs of 83 and 82, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.
At LRV 82 vs 52, Alabaster is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 82 vs 30, Alabaster is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 82 vs 60, Alabaster is decisively the brighter choice.
Alabaster reflects far more light (LRV 82 vs 58), opening up a space where Accessible Beige encloses it.
Alabaster reflects far more light (LRV 82 vs 27), opening up a space where Denim Drift encloses it.
At LRV 82 vs 43, Alabaster is decisively the brighter choice.
Alabaster reflects far more light (LRV 82 vs 55), opening up a space where Tranquil Dawn encloses it.
Alabaster reflects far more light (LRV 82 vs 44), opening up a space where Hardwick White encloses it.
Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 84 vs 82), so neither reads brighter in a room.
Alabaster reflects far more light (LRV 82 vs 66), opening up a space where Balboa Mist encloses it.
Alabaster reads slightly lighter (LRV 82 vs 74), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
Alabaster reflects far more light (LRV 82 vs 12), opening up a space where Pewter Green encloses it.
Alabaster reflects far more light (LRV 82 vs 68), opening up a space where Skimming Stone encloses it.
Alabaster reflects far more light (LRV 82 vs 12), opening up a space where Vintage Vogue encloses it.
Alabaster reflects far more light (LRV 82 vs 45), opening up a space where Saybrook Sage encloses it.
At LRV 82 vs 31, Alabaster is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 82 vs 7, Alabaster is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 82 vs 24, Alabaster is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 82 vs 57, Alabaster is decisively the brighter choice.