Alabaster vs Marshmallow
Alabaster and Marshmallow come from the same Sherwin-Williams collection. Hue-wise, Alabaster belongs to the beige-greige family and Marshmallow to the beige family. Their light reflectance values are nearly the same — 82 vs 82 — so neither will read significantly brighter or darker than the other. Both share a warm character, which means they'll respond to light and surrounding materials in similar ways. A ΔE of 0.9 puts them in subtle territory — distinguishable in direct comparison, less so from across a room. Below you'll find 3 real-room photo comparisons where both colors appear side by side, plus 5 simulated room previews.
Alabaster vs Marshmallow in Real Spaces
3 real rooms side by side. Alabaster and Marshmallow are close enough that the difference can be hard to judge from a chip alone — these photos show how each reads at scale, across different spaces and lighting conditions.
Living Room
A living room wall sees more varied light than almost any other surface in the house, which makes the choice between these two more nuanced than a chip suggests. At this scale the difference is subtle — you'd need them side by side, as shown here, to reliably tell them apart.
Bedroom
Bedrooms are typically lit with warmer, lower light than the rest of the house — a condition that flatters warm tones and deepens cool ones. In photos like these you're seeing the difference at its most direct. In a finished room, the distinction is there but not dramatic.
Bathroom
Small bathrooms intensify color. A shade that seems quiet in a larger room can feel immersive when you're surrounded by it on four walls. In photos like these you're seeing the difference at its most direct. In a finished room, the distinction is there but not dramatic.
Color Details
Alabaster vs Marshmallow Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see Alabaster on one side and Marshmallow on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More Alabaster comparisons
See how Alabaster stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
With LRVs of 83 and 82, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.
At LRV 82 vs 52, Alabaster is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 82 vs 30, Alabaster is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 82 vs 60, Alabaster is decisively the brighter choice.
Alabaster reflects far more light (LRV 82 vs 58), opening up a space where Accessible Beige encloses it.
Alabaster reflects far more light (LRV 82 vs 27), opening up a space where Denim Drift encloses it.
At LRV 82 vs 43, Alabaster is decisively the brighter choice.
Alabaster reflects far more light (LRV 82 vs 55), opening up a space where Tranquil Dawn encloses it.
Alabaster reflects far more light (LRV 82 vs 44), opening up a space where Hardwick White encloses it.
Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 84 vs 82), so neither reads brighter in a room.
Alabaster reflects far more light (LRV 82 vs 66), opening up a space where Balboa Mist encloses it.
Alabaster reads slightly lighter (LRV 82 vs 74), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
Alabaster reflects far more light (LRV 82 vs 12), opening up a space where Pewter Green encloses it.
Alabaster reflects far more light (LRV 82 vs 68), opening up a space where Skimming Stone encloses it.
Alabaster reflects far more light (LRV 82 vs 12), opening up a space where Vintage Vogue encloses it.
Alabaster reflects far more light (LRV 82 vs 45), opening up a space where Saybrook Sage encloses it.
At LRV 82 vs 31, Alabaster is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 82 vs 7, Alabaster is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 82 vs 24, Alabaster is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 82 vs 57, Alabaster is decisively the brighter choice.