Jon 66 quil 246 216 vs Shoji White
Jon 66 quil 246 216 and Shoji White come from the same Sherwin-Williams collection. Hue-wise, Jon 66 quil 246 216 belongs to the beige family and Shoji White to the beige-greige family. The 6-point LRV gap — 74 for Shoji White vs 68 for Jon 66 quil 246 216 — means Shoji White will open up a space more effectively. Both share a warm character, which means they'll respond to light and surrounding materials in similar ways. A ΔE of 30.9 puts these firmly in different territory — two distinct design choices rather than close alternatives. Below, 5 simulated room previews show how each color reads at scale — real-room photos will be added as they become available.
Color Details
Jon 66 quil 246 216 vs Shoji White Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see Jon 66 quil 246 216 on one side and Shoji White on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More Jon 66 quil 246 216 comparisons
See how Jon 66 quil 246 216 stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.

White Dove reflects far more light (LRV 83 vs 68), opening up a space where Jon 66 quil 246 216 encloses it.

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 69 vs 68), so neither reads brighter in a room.

Jon 66 quil 246 216 reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 6), opening up a space where Iron Ore encloses it.

At LRV 68 vs 52, Jon 66 quil 246 216 is decisively the brighter choice.

At LRV 68 vs 30, Jon 66 quil 246 216 is decisively the brighter choice.

Jon 66 quil 246 216 reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 52), opening up a space where Mizzle encloses it.

A 8-point LRV gap (68 vs 60) makes Jon 66 quil 246 216 the marginally brighter of the two.

Jon 66 quil 246 216 reads slightly lighter (LRV 68 vs 58), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.

Jon 66 quil 246 216 reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 27), opening up a space where Denim Drift encloses it.

At LRV 68 vs 43, Jon 66 quil 246 216 is decisively the brighter choice.

At LRV 68 vs 4, Jon 66 quil 246 216 is decisively the brighter choice.

Jon 66 quil 246 216 reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 55), opening up a space where Tranquil Dawn encloses it.

Jon 66 quil 246 216 reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 13), opening up a space where Bancha encloses it.

Jon 66 quil 246 216 reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 44), opening up a space where Hardwick White encloses it.

At LRV 84 vs 68, Pure White is decisively the brighter choice.

At LRV 68 vs 21, Jon 66 quil 246 216 is decisively the brighter choice.

With LRVs of 68 and 66, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.

Snowbound reflects far more light (LRV 83 vs 68), opening up a space where Jon 66 quil 246 216 encloses it.

Jon 66 quil 246 216 reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 12), opening up a space where Pewter Green encloses it.

With LRVs of 68 and 68, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.

At LRV 68 vs 41, Jon 66 quil 246 216 is decisively the brighter choice.

Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 68 vs 68), so neither reads brighter in a room.

At LRV 68 vs 25, Jon 66 quil 246 216 is decisively the brighter choice.

Jon 66 quil 246 216 reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 12), opening up a space where Vintage Vogue encloses it.

Jon 66 quil 246 216 reflects far more light (LRV 68 vs 45), opening up a space where Saybrook Sage encloses it.

At LRV 68 vs 31, Jon 66 quil 246 216 is decisively the brighter choice.

At LRV 68 vs 7, Jon 66 quil 246 216 is decisively the brighter choice.

At LRV 68 vs 24, Jon 66 quil 246 216 is decisively the brighter choice.

A 11-point LRV gap (68 vs 57) makes Jon 66 quil 246 216 the marginally brighter of the two.

A 4-point LRV gap (72 vs 68) makes Just Walnut the marginally brighter of the two.









