Natural Tan vs Symmetry
Both from Sherwin-Williams's palette. Both sit in the beige-greige family, which is useful context if you're narrowing within a single hue direction. Natural Tan (LRV 65) reflects noticeably more light than Symmetry (LRV 61), a difference of 4 points that becomes especially apparent in rooms with limited natural light. Both lean warm, so they'll behave similarly in mixed or changing light conditions. At ΔE 2.7, these are close — the kind of difference that matters when choosing between them, but doesn't read strongly in a finished room. Below, 5 simulated room previews show how each color reads at scale — real-room photos will be added as they become available.
Color Details
Natural Tan vs Symmetry Simulated Comparison
5 simulated room previews — drag the slider on each to see Natural Tan on one side and Symmetry on the other.
Digital color is approximate. These simulations are generated from the manufacturer's hex values and overlaid on grayscale room photos — your screen's calibration, brightness, and viewing angle all affect how they render. Before committing to either color, test physical samples in your own space under the light you actually live with.
More Natural Tan comparisons
See how Natural Tan stacks up against other well-photographed colors across different brands and tones.
White Dove reflects far more light (LRV 83 vs 65), opening up a space where Natural Tan encloses it.
A 4-point LRV gap (69 vs 65) makes Ammonite the marginally brighter of the two.
Natural Tan reflects far more light (LRV 65 vs 6), opening up a space where Iron Ore encloses it.
At LRV 65 vs 52, Natural Tan is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 65 vs 30, Natural Tan is decisively the brighter choice.
Natural Tan reflects far more light (LRV 65 vs 52), opening up a space where Mizzle encloses it.
A 5-point LRV gap (65 vs 60) makes Natural Tan the marginally brighter of the two.
Natural Tan reads slightly lighter (LRV 65 vs 58), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
Natural Tan reflects far more light (LRV 65 vs 27), opening up a space where Denim Drift encloses it.
At LRV 65 vs 43, Natural Tan is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 65 vs 4, Natural Tan is decisively the brighter choice.
Natural Tan reads slightly lighter (LRV 65 vs 55), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
Natural Tan reflects far more light (LRV 65 vs 13), opening up a space where Bancha encloses it.
Natural Tan reflects far more light (LRV 65 vs 44), opening up a space where Hardwick White encloses it.
At LRV 84 vs 65, Pure White is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 65 vs 21, Natural Tan is decisively the brighter choice.
With LRVs of 66 and 65, the two reflect almost the same amount of light.
Shoji White reads slightly lighter (LRV 74 vs 65), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
Snowbound reflects far more light (LRV 83 vs 65), opening up a space where Natural Tan encloses it.
Natural Tan reflects far more light (LRV 65 vs 12), opening up a space where Pewter Green encloses it.
Skimming Stone reads slightly lighter (LRV 68 vs 65), a gap that shows most in low-lit rooms.
At LRV 65 vs 41, Natural Tan is decisively the brighter choice.
Their light reflectance is nearly identical (LRV 68 vs 65), so neither reads brighter in a room.
At LRV 65 vs 25, Natural Tan is decisively the brighter choice.
Natural Tan reflects far more light (LRV 65 vs 12), opening up a space where Vintage Vogue encloses it.
Natural Tan reflects far more light (LRV 65 vs 45), opening up a space where Saybrook Sage encloses it.
At LRV 65 vs 31, Natural Tan is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 65 vs 7, Natural Tan is decisively the brighter choice.
At LRV 65 vs 24, Natural Tan is decisively the brighter choice.
A 8-point LRV gap (65 vs 57) makes Natural Tan the marginally brighter of the two.